< img src="https://savageventures.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/baby-bigfoot-3.jpeg?w=552"alt =""> A member of the general public Bigfoot Believers Facebook group posted a picture of a creature strolling through a woody area. It’s a fairly little creature, and even the deer in the foreground of the photo appear confused by what it is. Has somebody spotted a child Bigfoot?
The poster, Stephanie Wood, doesn’t claim to have taken the photograph, but she does not give credit to someone else, either. Rather, it appears as if she and another individual are disputing the photo’s legitimacy.
“Our instinct to this picture is that it’s most likely a short individual in a costume, maybe a kid, right? But after examining it for a while, we’re not so sure anymore,” she composed. “Could this be a baby Sasquatch or among those hairy little individuals that turn up in reports every now and then, which are referred to as ‘squatchlets’? Something we understand for sure is that the reality is really complete stranger than fiction in more cases than not. Chaka or a Squatchlet? You decide.”
And then the reply comments began flooding in.
One person commented: “Truthfully, the deer in the image make this 99.9% credible. This looks like a teen bigfoot I seen [sic] in a dream. (Never had a physical sighting but have witnessed/heard signs of sasquatch)”
While some individuals say the deer make the picture more credible, not everybody concurs.
One cynic states the deer would not still be standing there: “The most obvious feature of this picture is How does that figure get so near the deer without them bolting away? You can’t approach on [deer]”
Beyond the deer debate, many people chime in on the appearance of the Bigfoot and whether it’s most likely an outfit or not.
“My viewpoint is it’s a bad photoshop,” one commenter states.
A Recycled Debate
Some commenters and other veteran Bigfoot believers online say that if you’ve followed Bigfoot long enough, you know this baby Bigfoot picture isn’t new. Tim Binnall of Coast to Coast AM links to an undated but outdated-looking site sharing the exact same picture that Wood shared on Bigfoot Believers, in addition to a few other images that seem a series.
Binnall claims this picture first emerged over a decade back and that, at the time, “it was summarily dismissed by Bigfoot scientists as being fake.”
What do you consider this photo? Have you seen it before?
Did somebody area a child Bigfoot? Take a look at the viral image here and get some insight into the dispute raging online.
